Newsom

(PC) Young v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20232:23-cv-00092California692 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ZURI SANAKASIBA YOUNG, ADAM Case No. 2:23-cv-00092-DAD-JDP (PC)

ROBLEDO, AND ANTHONY LIPSEY,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiffs, THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE v. DENIED 12 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., ECF No. 9 13 Defendants. FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE

15 16 17 18 Plaintiff Zuri Young, a state prisoner, brings this section 1983 complaint against various officers of the Californian government, including Governor Newsom. ECF No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff, who has applied to proceed in forma pauperis, is a three-striker within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). His complaint does not show that he fits into that provision’s imminent danger exception. Accordingly, I recommend that his application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that plaintiff be directed to pay the filing fee before this action proceeds. Plaintiff has had at least three cases dismissed for failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.