Santoro
(PC) Hardy v. Santoro
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 KRISTIN HARDY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00327-ADA-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION TO COMPEL
R. MORENO, et al., (ECF No. 127)
13 Defendants. 14 15 Kristin Hardy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s unreasonable search and seizure claims against defendants Valencia, Moreno, Chavez, Dohs, and Ceballos, based on Plaintiff’s allegations that after Plaintiff was subjected to a full body scan, he was immediately subjected to an additional strip search without justification. (ECF Nos. 22, 42, & 43). On December 8, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel. (ECF No. 127). On December 23, 2022, Defendants filed their opposition. (ECF No. 133). This motion to compel is now before the Court. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff’s 26 …