(PC) Hammler v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20232:22-cv-01252California941 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No. 2:22-cv-01252-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS

v. CASE REGINA JOHNSON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

Defendants. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE

DENIED

14 ECF No. 5

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

17 18 Plaintiff has filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 5. He is, as explained in my previous order, ECF No. 12, a “three-striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was previously determined to have filed at least three cases that were dismissed for failure to state a viable claim. Three-strikers may still proceed in forma 23 1 See Hammler v. Dignity Health, No. 1:20-cv-1778-JLT-HBK (PC), 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230439, at *10-13 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021); Hammler v. California, No. 1:20-cv-00630- DAD-GSA (PC), 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81763, at *1-8 (E.D. Cal. May 8,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.