Felder

(PC) Dedmon v. Felder

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20232:23-cv-00234California2,170 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DE’ANDRE L. DEDMON, Sr., No. 2:23-cv-00234 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICHAEL FELDER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants violated plaintiff’s substantive and procedural due process rights. Presently before the court are plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1) and plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 2). For the reasons set forth below, the complaint will be dismissed with the opportunity to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff will be directed to file a new motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the certificate portion completed. //// //// //// //// //// IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) Accordingly, plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.