Riebe

(PC) Casity v. Riebe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20232:22-cv-02181California1,201 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD D. CASITY, Case No. 2:22-cv-02181-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS TODD RIEBE, et al., ECF No. 6 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: (1) FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OR

17 (2) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT SUBJECT TO A

RECOMMENDATION THAT IT BE

DISMISSED ECF No. 1 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE Plaintiff Richard Casity is a state inmate proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his complaint, he alleges that defendant district attorney Todd Riebe had him arrested for threatening defendant Matthew Riebe, who is Todd Riebe’s son and plaintiff’s son-in-law. These allegations are not sufficient to state a claim. I will 26 27 28 give…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.