Unknown

(PC) Solis v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20232:23-cv-00247California2,967 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSE SOLIS, No. 2:23-cv-00247 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNKNOWN, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants failed to provide adequate dental care and took his property without due process. Before the court is plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1) as well as plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2.) For the reasons stated below, the complaint will be dismissed with leave to amend. Additionally, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) Accordingly, plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.