Batista-Ruiz

Batista-Ruiz v. FCA US, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20231:22-cv-00713California303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAILENE DKOTA BATISTA-RUIZ, No. 1:22-cv-00713-ADA-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO v. TERMINATE DEFENDANT FCA US, LLC 14 FCA US, LLC, et al., (Doc. 30) 15 Defendants. 17 18 On April 5, 2023, the parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendant FCA US, LLC with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). (Doc. 30.) In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows: 22 [A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). “The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some or all of [their] claims, through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice,” and the dismissal “automatically terminates the action as to the defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.