Davidson
Davidson v. District Attorney of Bakersfield
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LOTISHA DAVIDSON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00581-ADA-CDB
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ACTION
v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF
BAKERSFIELD, 14-DAY DEADLINE
15 Defendants. (Doc. 5) 16 17 Plaintiff Lotisha Davidson is proceeding pro se in this action in which she asserts a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She and former Plaintiff Trevon Foreman1 filed their complaint against Defendant District Attorney of Bakersfield on May 16, 2022. (Doc. 1). Although the complaint names both Foreman and Davidson as plaintiffs in this action, the alleged injuries in the complaint appear limited to those sustained on behalf of former plaintiff Foreman. (Id. at p. 5). In particular, the complaint alleges that Cynthia Zimmer “deprived plaintiff (singular) of his protected constitutional rights” to a fair trial by forcing plaintiff to be tried before a white jury. 25 …