Shah
(PC) Armenta v. Shah
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RICHARD ARMENTA, Case No. 2:22-cv-00415-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: v. (1) STAND BY HIS SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT SUBJECT TO A
SHAH, et al., RECOMMENDATION THAT IT BE
DISMISSED; OR
Defendants. (2) FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 ECF No. 28
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, alleges that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by denying him adequate medical care. On August 8, 2022, I found that plaintiff’s initial complaint was deficient insofar as it did not comply with federal pleading standards and did not present a cognizable claim for medical deliberate indifference. ECF No. 21. I gave him leave to amend, and plaintiff has now filed both a first and a second amended complaint, the latter of which is operative. ECF Nos. 22 & 28. That complaint is plagued by the same deficiencies as its predecessor. I will give plaintiff one final opportunity to…