Davis
Davis v. Walmart Inc.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20231:22-cv-01381California508 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT DONALD DAVIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01381-ADA-CDB
Plaintiff,
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
v.
SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
WALMART INC, ET AL.,
THIS ACTION AND TO COMPLY WITH
THE COURT’S ORDERS
Defendants.
ECF No. 18
THREE-DAY DEADLINE
17 Defendants removed this case to federal court on October, 26, 2022. (ECF No. 1). The following day, the Court entered an Order setting a mandatory scheduling conference. (ECF No. 6). The Order directed Plaintiff to “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of service.” The Order further advised Plaintiff that failure to diligently prosecute this action “may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of unserved defendants.” On March 28, 2023, the parties convened for a scheduling conference after which the Court entered a scheduling order. (ECF Nos. 16, 17). That same day, the Court issued an order to show…