Davis

Davis v. Walmart Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20231:22-cv-01381California508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT DONALD DAVIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01381-ADA-CDB

Plaintiff,

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

v.

SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

WALMART INC, ET AL.,

THIS ACTION AND TO COMPLY WITH

THE COURT’S ORDERS

Defendants.

ECF No. 18

THREE-DAY DEADLINE

17 Defendants removed this case to federal court on October, 26, 2022. (ECF No. 1). The following day, the Court entered an Order setting a mandatory scheduling conference. (ECF No. 6). The Order directed Plaintiff to “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of service.” The Order further advised Plaintiff that failure to diligently prosecute this action “may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of unserved defendants.” On March 28, 2023, the parties convened for a scheduling conference after which the Court entered a scheduling order. (ECF Nos. 16, 17). That same day, the Court issued an order to show…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.