(PC)King
(PC)King v. Koenig
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KEVIN LYNELL KING, Case No. 2:21-cv-02250-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THE SECOND AMENDED
v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
M. KUERSTEN, et al., ECF No. 29 Defendants.
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE FOR
OBJECTIONS 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed a second amended complaint alleging that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to provide adequate medical care for his keratoconus eye condition. ECF No. 29 at 8. This complaint, like its predecessors, fails to state a cognizable claim. I now recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court…