(PC) Medina v. Amador Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20232:22-cv-02136California954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO MEDINA, Case No. 2:22-cv-02136-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: v. (1) FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OR

AMADOR JAIL, et al., (2) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT Defendants. SUBJECT TO A

RECOMMENDATION THAT IT BE

DISMISSED ECF No. 8 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE Plaintiff Antonio Medina is a pretrial detainee proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his complaint, he alleges that Amador Jail is overcrowd and not ADA compliant, and that defendant Dr. Son has denied him adequate medical treatment. The claims are not sufficiently related to proceed in a single action. I will give plaintiff an opportunity to file an amended complaint. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.