(PC) Singh v. Folsom State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20232:23-cv-00058California1,160 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAGHVENDRA SINGH Case No. 2:23-cv-00058-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS FOLSOM STATE PRISON, ECF No. 2 Defendant. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT

SUBJECT TO DISMISSAL, OR

17 (2) FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 18 ECF No. 1

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff Raghvendra Singh is a former state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his complaint, he alleges that Folsom State Prison violated his civil rights. The complaint, in its current form, does not state a claim. I will give plaintiff an opportunity to file an amended complaint, and I will grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.