Warn Industries, Inc. v. Agency 6 Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20232:22-cv-01358California1,894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 WARN INDUSTRIES, INC., No. 2:22-cv-01358 Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO STAY

AGENCY 6 INC., Defendant. 17 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff Warn Industries, Inc. brought this patent infringement action against Agency 6 Inc. alleging induced infringement, contributory infringement, and willful infringement. (Compl. (Docket No. 1).) Before the court is defendant’s motion to stay the case pending reexamination.1 (Mot. (Docket No. 22).) The factual allegations in this case are discussed at length in the court’s order denying defendant’s motion to 27 This matter was taken under submission without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). dismiss. (See Docket No. 21.) On February 2, 2023, defendant filed a request for ex parte reexamination of Patent No. 11,167,963, which is the subject of this action. (Mot. at 2.) On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.