Rosenlop

(PC) Edwards v. Rosenlop

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20232:23-cv-00071California1,049 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLEOTHA EDWARDS, Case No. 2:23-cv-00071-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS

ROSENLOP, ECF No.

Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: (1) FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OR

17 (2) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT SUBJECT TO A

RECOMMENDATION THAT IT BE

DISMISSED ECF No. 1 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 22 Plaintiff Cleotha Edwards is a state inmate proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that he contracted COVID-19 after defendant Rosenlop placed him in a crisis bed following an institutional transfer. Plaintiff’s complaint does not state a cognizable claim. I will give plaintiff a chance to amend his complaint and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.