CDCR

(PC) Carroll v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20231:23-cv-00005California4,368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TREMAINE CARROLL, Case No. 1:23-cv-00005-JLT-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE v. ACTION 12 CDCR, et al., (ECF No. 13) 13 Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Tremaine Carroll is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on January 3, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) On February 2, 2023, the Court screened the complaint, found no cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the Court’s February 2, 2023 order. Therefore, on March 14, 2023, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff has failed to respond…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.