(PC) Rojas v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20232:22-cv-01748California723 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, No. 2:22-cv-1748 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 3, 2023, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court found that plaintiff could proceed on the following claims: 1. Denial of medical treatment and use of excessive force in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment against defendant Leonard; 2. Denial of medical treatment in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment against defendant Bonde; and 3. Retaliation for protected conduct in violation of the First Amendment against defendant Bonde. Plaintiff was given two options: 1) proceed immediately on the claims identified above; or 2) attempt to cure the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.