(PC)Bazzo

(PC)Bazzo v. Gates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20231:21-cv-01343California552 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK MONACO BAZZO, Case No. 1:21-cv-01343-ADA-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS

v. S. GATES, et al., (Docs. 24-26) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On March 22, 2023, this Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 25.) The Court found Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (Doc. 24) stated cognizable Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement and deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Gates and Bobbola, and the unknown Does 1 through 5, but failed to state any other cognizable claims for relief against any other defendant. (Id. at 6-15.) Plaintiff was given 21 days to elect one of the following options: (1) to file a second amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the order; (2) to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.