Espinoza

(HC) Torres v. Espinoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20232:19-cv-00093California543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLLEEN IVA-MARIE TORRES, No. 2:19-cv-00093-DAD-CKD (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

JANEL ESPINOZA, PETITIONER’S MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO

FILE A FIRST AMENDED PETITION AND

Respondent. FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE (Doc. Nos. 38, 41)

17 Petitioner Colleen Iva-Marie Torres proceeds through appointed counsel with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 4, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that petitioner’s motion for leave to file an amended petition and for a stay and abeyance of these federal habeas proceedings pending exhaustion of unexhausted claims (Doc. No. 38) be granted. (Doc. No. 41.) As noted in the pending findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.