Pulido-Esparza

(PC) Spencer v. Pulido-Esparza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20231:20-cv-01176California11,705 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD B. SPENCER, 1:20-cv-001176-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY

ASSIGN A UNITED STATES DISTRICT

v. JUDGE TO THIS CASE

PULIDO-ESPARZA, et al., AND

Defenda nts. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE

PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANT

CDCR FOR VIOLATION OF THE ADA;

THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

(ECF No. 13.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE BY APRIL 20, 2023

23 I. BACKGROUND Edward B. Spencer (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (1994). On August 20, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.