(PC)Ruiz

(PC)Ruiz v. Stane

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20231:22-cv-00236California1,606 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00236-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTIONS TO APPOINT COUNSEL,

v. MOTION FOR AN INTERPRETER,

AND MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF

M. STANE, ET AL., TIME Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 30, 31, 32, 33) 16 Pending before the Court are four motions by Plaintiff Rogelio Ruiz seeking similar forms of relief or relief previously denied. (Doc. No. 30, 31, 32, 33). Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a pro se prisoner civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Sacramento Division of this Court, which was transferred to this Court on February 25, 2022. (Doc. Nos. 1, 4). Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on April 27, 2022. (Doc. No. 13. On July 15, 2022, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations to deny Plaintiff in forma pauperis status due to his three-strike status. (Doc. No. 23). For the reasons set forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.