(PS) Mendez v. Sacramento Police Officers
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTORIA REYES MENDEZ, Case No. 2:21-cv-01965-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO STATE A CLAIM
SACRAMENTO POLICE OFFICERS,
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
Defendants. DAYS 16 On December 19, 2022, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified her that it failed to state a claim, and allowed thirty days for her to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 4. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir.…