Lehil

(PC) Landreth v. Lehil

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20232:20-cv-00472California5,258 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON MICHAEL LANDRETH, No. 2:20-CV-0472-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BHUPINDER LEHIL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions relating to discovery propounded to Defendants Carrick and Lehil. Defendants oppose. See ECF Nos. 95, 97 & 96, 98. 20 I. SUMMARY OF PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS The following summarizes the pending motions relating to discovery and relief requested in each:

ECF No. Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery – Plaintiff seeks an order compelling further discovery responses from Defendants Carrick and Lehil. Defendants oppose Plaintiff’s motion. ECF No. 96 (“Motion 1”). 26 ECF No. Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery – Plaintiff seeks an order compelling further discovery responses from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.