Indong Advanced Materials, Inc. v. Green Energy Global, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INDONG ADVANCED MATERIALS, No. 2:23-cv-00427-DJC-DB
INC.,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 GREEN ENERGY GLOBAL, INC., et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff comes before this Court after having already been denied relief on a 18 substantially similar request. (ECF No. 9 (order by Judge Nunley denying Plaintiff’s ex 19 parte motion for writ of attachment and motion for temporary restraining order 20 (“TRO”) without prejudice).1) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES 21 Plaintiff’s ex parte application.
I. ANALYSIS
23 A. Plaintiff Still Fails to Show It Is Entitled to Ex Parte Relief 24 Though Plaintiff asks this Court to issue a writ of attachment, Plaintiff’s 25 justification for ex parte relief is based in part on the statutes governing writs of 26 27 1 On April 4, 2023, this matter was transferred to the undersigned by order of Chief Judge Mueller. (ECF No. 11.) possession. (See ECF No. 12-1 at 6–7.) Compare Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 485.010 (governing writs of attachment), with…