Athwal

Athwal v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20231:15-cv-00311California3,604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BALJIT ATHWAL, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00311-DJC-BAM Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS

TO COMPEL DEFENDANT COUNTY OF

v. STANISLAUS TO RESPOND TO REQUESTS

FOR ADMISSION

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., (Doc. 220) Defendants.

___________________________________ Case No. 1:20-cv-00770-DJC-BAM WALTER W. WELLS, et al., (Doc. 102) Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., Defendants. 22 Currently before the Court is a discovery dispute brought by Plaintiffs Baljit Athwal and Daljit Atwal and Plaintiffs Walter Wells and Scott McFarlane (together the “Moving Plaintiffs”) to compel Defendant County of Stanislaus (“the County”) to provide substantive responses to Plaintiffs’ Requests for Admission served on September 9, 2022. The individual actions brought by the Moving Plaintiffs have been consolidated for purposes of discovery, along with the actions 28 of Defillipo v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.