Kraft

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUNE KRAFT, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00768 JLT SKO ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ) ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO v. ) FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(e) ) TULARE COUNTY, et al., ) (Doc. 64) Defendants. ) ) 16 The Court entered judgment in this matter was entered on March 27, 2023, following the Court’s dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims for lack of standing. (Docs. 62, 63.) Plaintiff now moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to modify the judgment. (Doc. 64.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) permits a party to move a court to alter or amend its judgment. “A district court may grant a Rule 59(e) motion if it ‘is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there is an intervening change in the controlling law.’” Wood v. Ryan, 759 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting McDowell v. Calderon, 197 F.3d 1253,…