(PC)Perez

(PC)Perez v. Sandoval

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20231:22-cv-00391California700 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIAN PEREZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00391-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v. FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT

ORDERS

SANDOVAL, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Adrian Perez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On March 10, 2023, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 8.) The Court determined Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (Id. at 4, 8.) The Court directed Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the order, or to file a notice of voluntary dismissal withing 21 days of service of the order. (Id. at 8.) Although more than 21 days have passed without a response from Plaintiff, the Court notes a March 20, 2023, docket entry reflects Plaintiff did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.