McGechie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESTELLE McGECHIE, No. 2:22-cv-01812-DJC-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ATOMOS LIMITED, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply regarding the pending Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff makes this request on the grounds that defendant raised new arguments in their reply which plaintiff would like to now address. (Id. at 4-5.) Specifically, plaintiff asserts that “[d]efendant raised the addition of Atomos Inc. to assert that 1) Atomos Inc. is amenable to service of process in Australia and 2) Atomos Inc.’s addition to this action has no effect on this motion.” (Id. at 5.) Defendants have filed objections to plaintiff’s Motion to File Leave to File Sur- Reply. (ECF No. 29.) Defendants argue that the request should be denied as “sur- replies are not permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Eastern District of California’s Local Rules, or the Honorable Troy…