Cisneros

(PC) McKenna v. Cisneros

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20232:22-cv-01294California4,537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD PHILLIP MCKENNA, No. 2:22-cv-01294-KJM-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND T. CISNEROS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I. Procedural History On October 25, 2022, this court dismissed plaintiff’s 116 page complaint for failing to state a claim. Plaintiff was provided with the relevant legal standards governing his potential claims and granted leave to file an amended complaint. However, the court limited any amended complaint to no more than 25 pages based on plaintiff’s verbose and repetitious filings. Plaintiff was additionally warned against joining unrelated claims and defendants into a single action. By separate order, plaintiff’s multiple motions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.