White

(PC) Roberts v. White

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20231:21-cv-00167California2,361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID NATHANIEL ROBERTS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00167-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING ORDER GRANTING IN

FORMA PAUPERIS MOTION

v. (Doc. No. 7) WHITE, MUNOZ, BREWSTER, TAHT,

MORENO, RICHER, CALVINO, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

PLASCENSIO, BROGDON, PRECIADO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER

Defendants. 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g) (Doc. No. 4) FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 19 This matter comes before the Court upon re-review of the case docket. On February 17, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 7). After taking judicial notice of its files, the Court notes that Plaintiff has at least three dismissals that constitute a strike and finds the Complaint does not establish that Plaintiff meets the imminent danger exception. As a result, the undersigned revokes the February 17,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.