Cisneros

(HC) Reyna v. Cisneros

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20232:22-cv-02295California295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO ALFONSO REYNA, No. 2:22-cv-2295 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER THERESA CISNEROS, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner paid the filing fee. On March 29, 2019, petitioner was convicted of murder/robbery under special circumstances, and felon in possession of a firearm; he was sentenced to life without parole. In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the court has determined that the interests of justice require appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Federal Defender is appointed to represent petitioner. 2. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order on the Federal Defender, Attention: Habeas Appointment. 3. Petitioner’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.