Rendon
Rendon v. Infinity Fasteners, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC RENDON, individually on behalf of Case No. 1:20-cv-01538-ADA-BAM himself and all others similarly situated, under the Private Attorney General Act ORDER VACATING HEARING (PAGA), pursuant to Labor Code §§ 2698, et seq., ORDER RE UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT UNDER
Plaintiff, THE CALIFORNIA PRIVATE
ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT OF 2004
v. (“PAGA”) INFINITY FASTENERS, INC., a Kansas (Docs. 34, 41.) Corporation; and DOES 1-50; 17 Defendants.
19 Plaintiff Eric Rendon (“Plaintiff”) filed suit against Defendant Infinity Fasteners, Inc. 20 (“Defendant”) and DOES 1-50, alleging that they violated California’s Private Attorneys General 21 Act (“PAGA”), Labor Code, Business & Professions Code, and the Fair Employment and 22 Housing Act. (Doc. 1 at 4-39.) The parties reached a settlement, and now before the Court is 23 Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement. (Docs. 32, 34, 41.) The parties 24 filed a joint consent to…