Bonta

(PS) Rogers v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20232:22-cv-00314California1,064 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIM EDWARD ROGERS, No. 2:22–cv–314–TLN–KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v. ROB BONTA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding without the assistance of counsel, filed a complaint against several defendants; and plaintiff requested leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. (See ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Ultimately, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss in part, providing plaintiff with leave to amend after limited discovery on the identification of one doe defendant. (ECF Nos. 25, 30.) On March 20, 2023, the court noted that significant time had passed without an amended complaint being filed. Rather than recommending dismissal at that time, however, the court ordered plaintiff to inform the court why he had not amended his complaint. (ECF No. 31.) Plaintiff was given another 14 days to show cause and was warned—in even stricter terms— that failure to comply “will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.