Arnold

Arnold v. United States District Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20231:23-cv-00266California370 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIE ENCAR ARNOLD, Case No. 1:23-cv-00266-ADA-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND v. MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, et (Doc. 10) al. 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Marie Encar Arnold (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this action filed on February 22, 2023. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff has paid the filing fee and this matter is set for a scheduling conference on May 18, 2023; however, no Defendant has yet appeared. (Doc. 3). On March 31, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion for electronic filing. (Doc. 7). On April 5, 2023, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiff’s motion as it contained no explanation or justification for access to the electronic filing system. (Doc. 9). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion for electronic filing. (Doc. 10). Under the Court’s Local Rules, pro se parties are required to “file and serve paper documents” and “may not utilize electronic filing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.