(PC) Duncan v. California Healthcare Receivership Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20231:20-cv-01288California6,280 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIONTAE JOHAN DUNCAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01288-ADA-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

v. DEFENDANTS FROM PLAINTIFF’S

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE RECEIVERSHIP CORP., et al., (Doc. 52) 15 Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

17 I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of his original complaint on September 10, 2020. (Doc. 1.) In its First Screening Order issued June 14, 2021, the Court found Plaintiff’s complaint violated Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because it was “replete with arguments, conclusory statements, vague assertions, and unnecessary background.” (See Doc. 27 at 3.) Plaintiff was afforded the opportunity to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified; he was to do so within 21 days. (Id. at 7.) On July 20, 2021, the undersigned issued an Order to Show Cause…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.