Block

Block v. Salem

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20231:22-cv-01596California2,542 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:22-cv-01596-JLT-BAM Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING

MOHAMED NASSER SALEM, STATE LAW CLAIMS WITHOUT individually and dba QUICK MART, PREJUDICE 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Hendrick Block (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action on December 31, 2022, against Defendant Mohamed Nasser Salem, individually and dba Quick Mart. (Doc. 1.) The complaint alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.; the California Unruh Act, California Civil Code § 51 et seq.; and California Health and Safety Code §§ 19955, 19959. (Id.) Plaintiff seeks an award of statutory damages, costs of suit, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, injunctive or preventative relief, declaratory relief, and interest at the legal rate from the date of filing the complaint. (Id. at 8-9.) Defendant has not appeared…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.