(PC) Peterson v. Alameda County Sheriff Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20232:23-cv-00218California443 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARY LEE PETERSON, No. 2:23-cv-00218-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEP’T, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 7, 2023, the court found that plaintiff had failed to submit a certified trust account statement in support of his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 6. Accordingly, the court directed plaintiff to submit the certified trust account statement required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) within thirty days. Id. The court also warned plaintiff that failure to do so would result in this action being dismissed. Id. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, submitted the required trust account statement, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.1 ///// 26 1 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.