(SS) Knight v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20231:21-cv-00208California1,540 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PILAR KNIGHT, Case No. 1:21-cv-00208-CBD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

13 v. COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, (Doc. 25) Defendant.

On March 17, 2023, counsel for Plaintiff Pilar Knight (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Doc 25). On March 31, 2023, Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) responded to the fee request but did not oppose or support the motion. (Doc. 28). Accordingly, for the reasons set forth below, counsel for Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees shall be granted. Procedural and Factual Background On May 19, 2020, Plaintiff and counsel for Plaintiff, Jonathan O Peña, entered into a contingency fee agreement. (Doc. 25-3). The parties agreed to a 25% attorney’s fees, less any fees received under the Equal Access…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.