(PS) Peden v. Comcast Communications LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20232:22-cv-01551California1,358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESLEY ELVIS PEDEN, Case No. 2:22-cv-01551-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS COMCAST COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, ECF No. 2 et al., SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: Defendants. (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT

SUBJECT TO DISMISSAL, OR

17 (2) FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 18 ECF No. 1

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff Wesley Peden filed a complaint against Comcast Communications, LLC and Xfinity alleging that defendants attempted to blackmail him into making unnecessary payments. His complaint, however, fails to state a claim. I will give plaintiff a chance to amend his complaint before recommending dismissal. I will also grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2). Screening and Pleading Requirements A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.