CDCR
(PC) Pangborn v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID PANGBORN, No. 2:22-cv-1998 DAD KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. By separate order, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint. On December 12, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the court order defendants and Correctional Officer Sweeny to give plaintiff access to his legal property and the extension cord needed for his typewriter to work on his legal cases. (ECF No. 7 at 2.) The court construes plaintiff’s motion as a motion for preliminary injunction and denies the motion without prejudice. Governing Standards “A preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy never awarded as of right.” Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (citations omitted); Epona v. Cty. of Ventura, 876 F.3d 1214, 1227 (9th Cir. 2017). “The sole purpose…