Herrera

(PC) Elliott v. Herrera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20232:22-cv-01072California3,865 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER ELLIOTT, No. 2:22-cv-1072 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER Q. HERRERA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. In addition, plaintiff will be given an opportunity to amend the complaint. I. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.