Mironowski

Mironowski v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20231:22-cv-00675California2,166 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN R. MIRONOWSKI and Case No. 1:22-cv-00675-JLT-CDB

RUBEN MIRONOWSKI,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 v. (Doc. 17)

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

15 Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court is the motion of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Ford) Motion for protective order (Motion), filed March 9, 2023. (Doc. 17). Plaintiffs filed an opposition on March 23, 2023, and Ford replied on April 3, 2023. (Docs. 18, 19). The matter is fully briefed and the Court deems the matter suitable for disposition without need for oral argument. For the reasons stated below, Ford’s Motion is GRANTED. I. Background Plaintiffs filed a complaint against Ford on June 6, 2022. (Doc. 1). Plaintiffs allege claims pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 2310, The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, as well as the Song- Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. Cal. Civil Code §§1790 et. seq. These “lemon law” claims arose out of Plaintiffs’ warranty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.