(PC) Cross v. Sacramento Jail Medical

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20232:21-cv-02016California540 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFERY CROSS, Case No. 2:21-cv-02016-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING THE MARCH 8, 2023

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY

DAYS TO FILE AN AMENDED

SACRAMENTO JAIL MEDICAL, et al., COMPLAINT Defendants. ECF No. 15 16 17 On September 1, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found that the complaint’s allegations were insufficiently related to proceed in the same lawsuit. ECF No. 10. Accordingly, I granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. Id. at 4. I also warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the September 1 order could result in dismissal of this action. Id. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Thus, on November 2, 2022, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed. ECF No. 11. I notified him that if he wished to continue with this action, he must file an amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.