Campbell

(PC) Rogers v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20231:21-cv-00021California893 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES A. ROGERS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00021-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

K. CAMPBELL, et al., (Doc. 18)

Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN

21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF SERVICE OF

THIS ORDER

18 Plaintiff Charles A. Rogers is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On January 31, 2023, the Court issued its Second Screening Order. (Doc. 15.) The Court found Plaintiff had stated a cognizable First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Campbell, but that the remaining claims did not state a cognizable claim against any other defendant. (Id. at 9-16.) Plaintiff was ordered to do one of the following: (1) file a third amended complaint curing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.