Campbell
(PC) Rogers v. Campbell
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20231:21-cv-00021California893 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES A. ROGERS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00021-JLT-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS
v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
K. CAMPBELL, et al., (Doc. 18)
Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN
21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF SERVICE OF
THIS ORDER
18 Plaintiff Charles A. Rogers is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On January 31, 2023, the Court issued its Second Screening Order. (Doc. 15.) The Court found Plaintiff had stated a cognizable First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Campbell, but that the remaining claims did not state a cognizable claim against any other defendant. (Id. at 9-16.) Plaintiff was ordered to do one of the following: (1) file a third amended complaint curing the…