(HC) Richson-Bey v. People of the State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN J. RICHSON-BEY, No. 1:23-cv-00566-JLT-SKO Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE
v. COURT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF [TWENTY-ONE DAY OBJECTION
CALIFORNIA, DEADLINE]
15 Respondent.
17 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of removal of a state court prosecution from the Kings County Superior Court to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1455. Because it appears that removal should not be permitted, see 28 U.S.C. § 1455(b)(4),1 the Court recommends that the case be summarily REMANDED to state court. DISCUSSION Petitioner alleges that on March 20, 2023, he was arraigned in Kings County Superior Court on an unstated charge. (Doc. 1 at 11.) He states he has attended two preliminary hearings
1 When a notice of removal is filed, a district court “shall examine the notice promptly. If…