Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GEORGE THOMAS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01513-ADA-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED

PROTECTIVE ORDER, IN PART

CITY OF FRESNO, et al., (ECF No. 10) Defendants.

15 16 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ proposed stipulated protective order. (ECF 17 No. 10). While the parties submitted a Word version of their stipulation protective order to the 18 Court as required by Local Rule 137(b), that stipulation contains material omissions. For 19 example, the proposed order filed on the docket has a definitions section. (ECF No. 10, pp. 5-7). 20 However, the Word version sent to the Court omits most of these definitions. Accordingly, the 21 Court addresses the parties’ stipulated protective order as filed on the docket. (ECF No. 10). 22 Upon review of the parties’ stipulated protective order (ECF No. 10), the Court finds it acceptable in most respects. However, the Court notes that the parties define the term “Protected Material/Confidential…