King

King v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20232:20-cv-01326California916 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVIS KING, an individual, Case No.: 2:20-cv-01326-KJM-DB Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO

AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER AND

v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO, as a municipality, JONATHAN HOUSTON, in his individual capacity, ANTHONY Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller BOLER, in his individual capacity, ERIC KLOCKENBRINK, COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION and DOES 1-100; Defendants. 19 INTRODUCTION The Court issued an Initial Scheduling Order on December 2, 2022. (ECF No. 32) The Parties have concluded their written discovery and the deposition of Plaintiff has been taken. The deposition of individual defendants and Persons Most Knowledgeable have been duly noticed and scheduled. However, due to the scheduling conflicts of the Parties, the depositions cannot occur prior to the discovery cut-off date of April 15, 2023. In the interest of preserving judicial resources, the parties have stipulated that the scheduling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.