(PC)Royal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FREDDIE LAMONT ROYAL, No. 2:20-CV-0218-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ALEXANDER IEROKOMOS, Defendant.

17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as 19 provided by the Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On December 30, 2022, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 21 recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that 22 the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the 23 findings and recommendations have been filed. 24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 25 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions 26 of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 27 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both 28 the…