Edwards

(PC) Delphin v. Edwards

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20232:23-cv-00493California2,758 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEREMY DELPHIN, No. 2:23-cv-0493 DB P Plaintiff,

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND EDWARDS, et al. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 17 §1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff’s 18 complaint for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court grants plaintiff’s motion to 19 proceed in forma pauperis and finds: (1) plaintiff has stated some claims that are potentially 20 cognizable under §1983; (2) plaintiff fails to state other claims; and (3) one claim should be 21 dismissed. This court will give plaintiff the choice to proceed on the claims found potentially 22 cognizable herein or amend his complaint. In addition, this court recommends dismissal of one 23 claim.

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

25 Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 26 Accordingly, the request to proceed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.