(HC) Gutierrez v. Warden, FCI-Mendota

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE GUTIERREZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-00359-HBK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING CONSTRUED MOTION

TO SUPPLEMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v. (Doc. No. 6) WARDEN, FCI-MENDOTA,

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER LEAVE

Respondent. TO FILE FIRST AMENDED PETITION 16 17 18 Petitioner Jose Gutierrez, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on March 9, 2023. (Doc. No. 1, “Petition”). On March 23, 2023, Petitioner filed a pleading titled “Supplement Document in Support of Petitioner’s 2241 Motion,” now pending before the Court. (Doc. No. 6). The Supreme Court has instructed federal courts to liberally construe the “inartful pleading[s]” of pro se litigants. See Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982). The Court construes Petitioner’s “Supplement Document in Support of Petitioner’s 2241 Motion,” as a Motion to Supplement the Petition. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may be…